BY REBECCA LINDENBERG
What thou lov’st well shall not be reft from thee;
What thou lov’st well is thy true heritage.
Ezra Pound
You’ll find labels describing what is gone:
an empress’s bones, a stolen painting
of a man in a feathered helmet
holding a flag-draped spear.
A vellum gospel, hidden somewhere long ago
forgotten, would have sat on that pedestal;
this glass cabinet could have kept the first
salts carried back from the Levant.
To help us comprehend the magnitude
of absence, huge rooms
lie empty of their wonders—the Colossus,
Babylon’s Hanging Gardens and
in this gallery, empty shelves enough to hold
all the scrolls of Alexandria.
My love, I’ve petitioned the curator
who has acquired an empty chest
representing all the poems you will
now never write. It will be kept with others
in the poet’s gallery. Next door,
a vacant room echoes with the spill
of jewels buried by a pirate who died
before disclosing their whereabouts.
I hope you don’t mind, but I have kept
a few of your pieces
for my private collection. I think
you know the ones I mean.
Rebecca Lindenberg’s elegy, by far, fits more closely with
the modern trends described in the poets.org article: “Many modern elegies have
been written not out of a sense of personal grief, but rather a broad feeling
of loss and metaphysical sadness.” The Museum
described is actually empty, but was at one time filled with valuable and
rare treasures. At first reading it appears that the elegy focuses mainly on
grief and loss: for example, comparing the feeling of absence with a well-recognized
symbol of lost potential—the “empty shelves” of the library of Alexandria. At
the same time, this could have been an idealized view of the person who is the
subject of the poem. A person could mean the world to one person, and be
disregarded by all others. There could have been good days and bad days in the
relationship of the speaker and the subject, but the memories which remain are
treasured. Some solace does come from the memories that the speaker keeps for themself,
which are the pieces kept for a “private collection.” In life, there is a way
that people mourn loss publicly, differently from how loss is mourned in
private, which Lindenberg comments on. We might not all have a physical manifestation
of emptiness, but each person has a version of someone no longer here that
remains in their mind.
(I chose this poem mainly because the author's name struck me as familiar— I came across her first published collection of poetry at a bookstore over the summer and read most of it that afternoon. It's called Love, An Index and it's right here.)
Cited:
Lindenburg, Rebecca. "In the Museum of Lost
Objects." Poetry Foundation. Poetry Foundation, 20 Mar. 2012. Web. 24
Sept. 2014. <http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/243894>.
We chose the same poet! I am drawn to this piece the same way I was drawn to the one I chose; the use of language and imagery is fantastic. I especially love "I think you know which ones I mean." She only uses a few words, but is able to capture the close bond she shared with her love. I also like the use of couplets. One of my instructors once said that couplets are the lovers of stanzas; it is a fitting use of line breaks for what is essentially a love poem.
ReplyDeleteI went to Amazon and ordered her book. I'm dying to read it.